THE SCIENCE OF TASTE: WHY WE CRAVE SWEET, SOUR, BITTER, OR SALTY
- Caleb Asharley
- Dec 1
- 19 min read
Introduction
Have you ever enjoyed a delicious, mouth-watering meal, a slice of ripe fruit, or a rich, dark piece of chocolate? Did you wonder how something could taste so good? Mmmmm! yummy!
A recent study examined why Ghanaian consumers often prefer foods from multinational brands over traditional local options.
The results found that taste and flavor play a central role in shaping these choices (Nyarko, E. and Bartelme, T. 2024).
While we usually give credit to the tongue, the enjoyment is far more complex than a simple feeling in the tongue. The experience of "taste" is a complex mechanism involving far more than just your taste buds. At the foundation of this process lie the five fundamental tastes: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami.
Understanding taste requires more than just biology; it’s a complex interplay of chemistry, neuroscience, and even culture. Scientists study flavor as the interaction of physical and chemical signals that the brain interprets as sensations.
Psychologists and anthropologists, on the other hand, see taste as deeply tied to memory, geography, and tradition. And for chefs and food lovers, taste is an art, an experience shaped by balance, contrast, and pleasure.
Taste is central to our food choices. Generally, we crave sweetness and shy away from bitterness; yet, certain levels of bitterness in coffee, chocolate, or tea enhance flavor complexity and enjoyment. These interactions among sweet, sour, and bitter elements, combined with aroma and texture, create the rich diversity of foods we love.
As Confucius once observed, “Everyone eats and drinks, but few appreciate taste.” When we begin to understand the science behind it, we join the few who do. Taste not only defines our enjoyment of food but also reflects our biology, psychology, and evolution. It shapes what we crave, how we eat, and why certain flavors bring us joy.
THE BIOLOGY OF TASTE
Human taste can be distilled into the five basic qualities of sweet, sour, bitter, salty, and umami (savory). Taste buds work with the olfactory receptors in your nose to allow you to experience flavor. Yet, taste is only one part of the intricate symphony that forms our eating experience. The moment we see, smell, or even think about food, our senses collaborate to prepare the body for digestion.
The aroma of freshly baked bread or sizzling food can trigger salivation, a rise in digestive hormones, and stomach contractions long before the first bite. Once food enters the mouth, receptors for taste, temperature, and touch begin assessing it, judging not only whether it is safe or spoiled, but also whether it will nourish or harm us.
Appetitive tastes such as sweet, umami, and mild saltiness signal nutritional value, carbohydrates, proteins, and electrolytes essential for life. Conversely, bitter, sour, and overly salty sensations often act as biological warning systems, detecting potential toxins, spoiled material, or excessive mineral content.
The body also interprets texture-related cues: a gritty or sharp sensation may warn of unripe or contaminated material, while creamy and smooth textures suggest energy-rich fats. Even temperature adds another dimension, telling us whether a meal is palatable or dangerous to consume. Together, these signals feed into a complex neural network that determines how we perceive, evaluate, and ultimately respond to food.
Taste Buds: The Microscopic Sensors of Flavor
Although the human soft palate contains taste buds, the main organ of taste is classically considered the tongue and the primary structure that houses the sensory endings is called papillae. It contains taste buds that are sensitive to chemicals in ingested food or drink. Different types of papillae are found in different regions of the tongue. The taste buds contain specialized gustatory receptor cells that respond to chemical stimuli dissolved in the saliva.
These receptor cells activate sensory neurons that are part of the facial and glossopharyngeal nerves.
The biological journey of taste begins in clusters of specialized sensory structures known as taste buds. These tiny, onion-shaped organs are embedded within the lining of the mouth and throat, concentrated primarily on the tongue. Humans typically possess between 2,000 and 10,000 taste buds, although this number varies widely among individuals (Khan et al., 2019). People with higher densities, sometimes called supertasters, experience flavors with far greater intensity.
Taste buds are found within papillae, the small protrusions that give the tongue its rough surface. There are four main types of papillae:
Fungiform papillae, mushroom-like structures scattered mostly on the tip and sides of the tongue.
Foliate papillae, located along the back edges of the tongue, contain rows of taste buds within their folds.
Circumvallate papillae, the large, dome-shaped structures arranged in a V-shape near the rear of the tongue, each housing hundreds of taste buds.
Filiform papillae, the most numerous types, which do not contain taste buds but instead detect texture, temperature, and friction—helping us sense the crunchiness of chips or the smoothness of cream.
Each taste bud is a microscopic marvel containing 50–100 taste receptor cells tightly packed together and surrounded by supportive and basal cells (Roper and Chaudhari, 2017). A tiny opening at the surface, known as a taste pore, allows dissolved food molecules to enter and interact with receptor cells. When we eat, saliva dissolves food particles into chemical molecules that diffuse through this pore and bind to the receptors, initiating the process of taste transduction. While people often use “taste” and “flavor” interchangeably, taste technically refers to the sensations detected by specialized cells in our mouth, traditionally the five fundamental tastes.
Receptor Cell Types and Their Functions
Taste buds are composed of several distinct cell types, each playing a specialized role:
Type I cells, or supporting cells, maintain the ionic balance within the taste bud and may contribute to detecting salty tastes.
Type II cells, known as receptor cells, contain G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that detect sweet, bitter, and umami compounds. When these receptors are activated, they trigger intracellular pathways that lead to the release of ATP, which then excites neighboring nerve fibers.
Type III cells, called presynaptic cells, are primarily responsible for detecting sour stimuli and releasing neurotransmitters such as serotonin (5-HT) and GABA to communicate with sensory neurons.
Basal progenitor cells serve as stem cells, continually dividing and differentiating into new receptor cells, replacing those that wear out every 10–14 days.
Interestingly, each receptor cell type is tuned to one or a few taste qualities, meaning a “sweet” cell won’t respond to bitter molecules. This molecular specificity allows the brain to distinguish between different tastes with remarkable precision.
THE FIVE BASIC TASTES
For centuries, scientists recognized four main taste categories: sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. However, in the early 20th century, researchers identified a fifth, distinct taste known as umami, meaning “savory” in Japanese. Each of these tastes has unique chemical triggers, biological roles, and evolutionary purposes that shape our experience of food.
a. Sweet
Sweetness is detected when sugars or other sweet-tasting molecules bind to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the taste buds, mainly the T1R2/T1R3 heterodimer (Nelson et al., 2001). These receptors trigger signals that tell the brain a food is rich in carbohydrates—a quick source of energy. From an evolutionary perspective, this preference helped humans seek out energy-dense foods for survival. Sweet foods activate the brain’s reward pathways, releasing dopamine, which links sweetness with pleasure. This mechanism, though beneficial in nature, contributes to modern issues like sugar cravings and addictive eating.
Mechanism of Sweet Stimulus Transduction
Sweet molecules (sugar or sweeteners) bind to G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) on the surface of a taste receptor cell — specifically, the T1R2/T1R3 receptor complex.
This activates a G protein inside the cell, known as gustducin.
Gustducin then triggers an enzyme cascade, producing second messengers (like cyclic AMP or IP₃).
These second messengers cause ion channel changes — typically closing K⁺ channels and allowing Ca²⁺ ions to enter the cell.
The resulting electrical depolarization releases neurotransmitters at the base of the taste cell.
These neurotransmitters then stimulate sensory nerve fibers, sending the “sweet” signal to the brain.
b. Sour
Sour taste is detected when we eat foods that contain acids, such as lemons or vinegar. This taste is sensed by specialized Type III taste receptor cells found within the taste buds of the tongue and palate. These cells respond directly to the hydrogen ions (H⁺) released by acids (Turner & Liman, 2022). From an evolutionary view, sour taste served as a natural warning system: strong acidity often indicated unripe fruit or spoiled food. At the same time, moderate sourness could signal beneficial nutrients such as vitamin C, which was essential for survival. Cultural preferences for sourness vary widely, as seen in the popularity of fermented foods, vinegars, and citrus dishes.
How Type III Cells Detect Sour Taste
Acids release hydrogen ions (H⁺): When acidic foods mix with saliva, they dissociate and produce free hydrogen ions.
H⁺ ions enter Type III cells: Unlike sweet or bitter receptors that rely on GPCRs, sour-sensing cells detect acidity through proton channels (such as OTOP1) that allow H⁺ ions to flow directly into the cell.
Intracellular acidification: The influx of H⁺ lowers the cell’s internal pH and blocks potassium (K⁺) channels, preventing K⁺ from leaving the cell.
Depolarization and calcium influx: This build-up of positive charge depolarizes the cell membrane, causing voltage-gated calcium channels to open and allowing Ca²⁺ to enter.
Neurotransmitter release: The rise in intracellular calcium triggers the release of serotonin (5-HT) from the taste cell.
Signal transmission: Serotonin activates nearby gustatory nerve fibers, sending the signal to the brain, where it is interpreted as the sour taste.
c. Salty
Salt is one of the most recognizable and universally enjoyed tastes. Found naturally in foods like seafood, cheese, and salted meats, and added as table salt (sodium chloride) to enhance flavor, it plays a vital role in both culinary culture and human biology. Beyond adding flavor, salt provides sodium, which is vital for maintaining fluid balance, nerve function, and muscle activity. The body’s sensitivity to salt helps us regulate these functions and crave electrolytes when we need more electrolytes.
The salty taste is triggered by sodium ions (Na⁺) entering taste cells through epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs). These channels help the body regulate sodium levels, which are essential for fluid balance, nerve signaling and muscle function (Taruno & Gordon, 2023). A craving for salty foods often indicates the body’s need for electrolytes, especially after sweating or dehydration. However, excessive sodium intake can strain the cardiovascular system, increasing the risk of high blood pressure (Dong et al., 2018).
How Taste Buds Detect Salty Stimuli
Unlike sweet, bitter, or umami tastes that rely on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), salty taste depends on direct ion flow.
Concentration Gradient: Eating salty foods increases the sodium ion (Na⁺) concentration outside the taste cells relative to the inside.
Direct Ion Influx via ENaC: Salty taste relies on direct ion flow. Sodium ions enter taste receptor cells through Epithelial Sodium Channels (ENaCs), specifically the amiloride-sensitive type.
Membrane Depolarization: The entry of positively charged Na⁺ ions reduce the negative resting potential of the cell, causing the membrane to depolarize.
Opening of Voltage-Gated Channels: Depolarization triggers nearby voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels to open, allowing Ca²⁺ ions to flow in.
Neurotransmitter Release: The calcium influx prompts synaptic vesicles to fuse with the membrane, releasing neurotransmitters (similar to Type III taste cells).
Signal Transmission: These neurotransmitters activate sensory nerve fibers, sending the “salty” signal to the brain for processing.
Biological Importance
Our attraction to salt has deep evolutionary roots. Early humans needed it to maintain hydration and nerve function, especially in hot climates where sodium loss through sweat was common. Even today, salt cravings can signal the body’s need for electrolyte balance. However, with modern diets high in processed foods, excess sodium can lead to hypertension and related health risks—making balance as important as flavor.
d. Bitter
Bitterness is one of the most complex and intriguing tastes. It’s found in foods and drinks like coffee, dark chocolate, kola, grapefruit, green tea, and hops in beer. Unlike sweetness or saltiness, which often signal safety and nourishment, bitterness evolved as a protective warning, alerting us to the possible presence of toxins or spoiled substances. Yet over time, humans have learned to appreciate bitter flavors, often associating them with richness, complexity, and health benefits.
Common Bitter Compounds
Alkaloids: such as caffeine in coffee, theobromine in chocolate, and quinine in tonic water.
Glucosinolates: found in cruciferous vegetables like kale and Brussels sprouts.
Flavonoids: present in grapefruit, green tea, and other plant-based foods.
Isohumulones: found in hops used for brewing beer.
Mechanism of Bitter Taste Detection
Receptor binding: A bitter compound binds to a TAS2R receptor (Type 2 Taste Receptor) on the surface of the taste cell.
G-protein activation: This binding activates a G protein called gustducin, which starts the cell’s internal signalling cascade.
Second messenger production: Gustducin activates the enzyme phospholipase C beta 2 (PLCβ2), which produces two messenger molecules: Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃), which mobilizes calcium from internal stores, and Diacylglycerol (DAG), which helps propagate the signal inside the cell.
Calcium release: IP₃ binds to receptors on the endoplasmic reticulum, causing a release of calcium ions (Ca²⁺) into the cytoplasm.
Cell depolarization: The calcium influx activates ion channels such as TRPM5, depolarizing the cell membrane and generating an action potential.
Neurotransmitter release: Depolarization triggers the release of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) from the taste cell.
Signal transmission: ATP activates sensory nerve fibers, which carry the bitter signal to the brain, resulting in the perception of bitterness.
e. Umami
Umami is recognized as the fifth basic taste, often described as a savory, meaty, or mouth-filling flavor that enhances the overall taste of food. It is primarily caused by the amino acid glutamate and nucleotides such as inosinate (IMP) and guanylate (GMP), which naturally occur in protein-rich foods. Umami is detected when glutamate-rich foods bind to specialized taste receptors called T1R1/T1R3, a pair of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), (Kurihara, 2015).
Common Umami-Rich foods are: Mushrooms, aged cheeses (e.g., Parmesan), ripe tomatoes, Soy sauce, Seaweed, Fermented fish sauces, and Meat broths (beef or chicken stock). This taste adds richness and flavor, creating the mouth-filling sensation often described as deliciousness or savoriness.
How We Taste Umami
Receptor binding: Umami substances, such as L-glutamate, bind to the T1R1/T1R3 receptor complex on the taste cell membrane. Enhancers like IMP and GMP can also bind, boosting receptor activity.
G-protein activation: Binding activates an associated G protein, causing GDP to be replaced by GTP and triggering intracellular signaling. Intracellular signaling: The activated G protein stimulates phospholipase C beta 2 (PLCβ2), producing two second messengers: Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃) and Diacylglycerol (DAG)
Calcium release: IP₃ binds to receptors on intracellular stores (endoplasmic reticulum), causing a release of calcium ions (Ca²⁺) into the cytoplasm.
Depolarization: The rise in intracellular Ca²⁺ activates the TRPM5 cation channel, depolarizing the taste cell and changing its membrane potential.
Neurotransmitter release: Depolarization triggers the release of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) from the taste cell.
Neural signaling: ATP binds to purinergic receptors on gustatory nerve fibers, which transmit the umami signal to the brain, where it is recognized as a savory taste.
FROM THE TONGUE TO THE BRAIN
The information gathered by taste receptor cells must travel a complex neural pathway before becoming what we recognize as flavor. Once activated, these receptor cells send electrical impulses through three main cranial nerves:
Facial nerve (cranial nerve VII): Carries taste signals from the front part of the tongue.
Glossopharyngeal nerve (cranial nerve IX): Transmits taste information from the back of the tongue, where bitter and sour tastes are strongest.
Vagus nerve (cranial nerve X): Conveys taste sensations from the throat and nearby areas.
In addition, the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V) detects sensations such as temperature, texture, and pain, allowing us to feel the coolness of mint, the burn of chili, or the fizz of carbonation.
Taste signals first converge in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) in the brainstem, where initial processing occurs. From there, the information travels to the thalamus, which relays it to the gustatory cortex in the insula and frontal operculum. At this stage, taste signals combine with inputs from smell and touch to form the full sensory experience of flavor. The brain organizes these signals in a gustotopic map, with different areas responding to sweet, sour, salty, or bitter tastes.
The Role of Smell, Texture, and Temperature
While taste buds provide the primary chemical signals, flavor as we experience it is impossible without smell. Olfactory receptors in the nasal cavity detect volatile compounds released from food, especially during chewing and exhalation. This process, called retronasal olfaction, integrates with taste signals to create the complete sensory experience. That’s why food seems tasteless when we have a blocked nose; the olfactory contribution is missing.
Texture, or mouthfeel, adds another critical layer. Mechanoreceptors and thermoreceptors in the oral cavity detect physical sensations such as creaminess, crispness, viscosity, and temperature. The trigeminal nerve also senses pungent or irritating compounds, like the burn of wasabi or the cooling effect of menthol. These sensations are not tastes themselves, but they play a major role in making food pleasant or unpleasant.
Adaptation, Renewal, and Variation
Taste is a dynamic system, constantly adapting to maintain sensitivity. Taste receptor cells regenerate roughly every two weeks, ensuring continued responsiveness despite daily exposure to heat, chemicals, and mechanical stress. However, taste perception changes over time due to aging, health conditions, medications, or smoking. Older individuals often have fewer functioning taste buds, which can dull taste perception.
Genetic variations also influence taste. For example, differences in genes such as TAS2R38 determine whether certain vegetables—like Brussels sprouts or kale—taste intensely bitter or mildly pleasant.
Hormones such as leptin, insulin, and ghrelin can modulate taste sensitivity, linking taste perception with appetite and metabolism. This biological feedback system helps align our cravings with the body’s nutritional needs—or, in modern diets, sometimes works against us.
TASTE AND HEALTH
Impact of excessive sweet or salty food consumption on metabolic health
Sweet foods trigger a powerful dopamine reward in the brain, which is why desserts and sugary drinks are so easy to crave. But when sugar becomes a daily staple, the body starts storing more fat, insulin sensitivity declines, and appetite and blood pressure regulation become disrupted, increasing the risk of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. Similarly, excessive salt intake strains the cardiovascular system. Sodium is essential for nerve and muscle function, but modern diets often supply far more than the body needs. When salt intake is consistently high, the cardiovascular system works overtime, raising blood pressure and straining the kidneys.
Together, excessive sugar and salt can disrupt the body’s metabolic flexibility, which is the ability to smoothly switch between burning carbs and fats for energy.
Bitter compounds and antioxidants: why they’re good for you
Bitter flavors have an evolutionary history; they once warned our ancestors about potential toxins in plants. Today, however, many bitter foods are nutritional powerhouses. Vegetables like kale and broccoli, and plant-based products like cocoa, coffee, and green tea, are rich in polyphenols and flavonoids: natural antioxidants that help the body reduce inflammation and neutralize harmful free radicals.
Interestingly, the very bitterness that once signaled danger now flags foods that support liver detoxification, digestive function, and cellular repair. Our tongues may resist bitterness at first, but our bodies often benefit from it the most.
How taste perception changes with age or illness
As we age, taste receptor sensitivity declines, particularly for sweet and salty flavors, leading to changes in dietary preference and reduced appetite (Chaudhari and Roper, 2010). Illness can also distort or reduce taste. Viral infections, cancer therapies, certain medications, or neurological disorders may cause dysgeusia, a condition where food tastes different, muted, or unpleasant. Because taste is tightly linked to appetite, mood, and enjoyment of food, these changes can affect nutrition and emotional well-being.
Artificial sweeteners and their influence on taste expectations
Artificial sweeteners deliver sweetness without the calories, which sounds like the perfect solution, but the brain may see it differently. Because these sweeteners can be hundreds of times sweeter than sugar, frequent use can raise the brain’s dopamine levels, making naturally sweet foods like fruits seem less satisfying.
This does not mean artificial sweeteners are harmful; they can be helpful tools for short-term calorie control or diabetes management. But relying on them too heavily may shift dietary habits, conditioning the palate to prefer exaggerated sweetness over balanced, natural flavors.
TASTE DISORDERS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Dysgeusia and Ageusia: When Taste Goes Wrong
Taste disorders range from dysgeusia, an altered or distorted sense of taste, to ageusia, the complete loss of taste. These conditions can arise from infections, nutritional deficiencies (especially zinc), medication side effects, smoking or nerve damage.
When taste is disrupted, people often experience reduced appetite, weight loss, and poor nutrition, especially in older adults. Treatment depends on the cause and may involve correcting deficiencies, adjusting medications, or managing underlying conditions.
Taste Changes in Disease
Several illnesses profoundly affect taste perception:
Cancer and Chemotherapy: Treatments commonly damage taste receptor cells, causing metallic, bitter, or bland taste perceptions that make eating difficult.
COVID-19: A hallmark symptom is sudden loss of taste and smell due to viral effects on support cells in the olfactory and gustatory system.
Neurological Conditions: Disorders like Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and multiple sclerosis can alter taste sensitivity by affecting neural pathways.
Medications: Antibiotics, antidepressants, and antihistamines often interfere with taste receptor function or saliva chemistry.
CHEMESTHESIS: THE “FAKE” TASTES OF HEAT, COOL, AND TINGLING
Not all sensations we experience while eating come from taste buds.
Chemesthesis refers to the chemical activation of pain, touch, and temperature receptors in the mouth.
Why Chili Burns
Chili peppers contain capsaicin, which activates TRPV1 receptors, normally responsible for detecting heat. The brain interprets this activation as a burning sensation, even though no actual heat is present.
Why Mint Feels Cold
Mint contains menthol, which stimulates TRPM8 receptors, the same receptors activated when the mouth encounters cold temperatures. This tricks the brain into sensing coolness.
Tingling Foods
Sichuan peppercorns, carbonated drinks, and cloves activate TRPA1 and related ion channels, producing numbing or tingling sensations. These sensations add complexity to the eating experience, but are not taste; they belong to the trigeminal (touch/pain) system rather than the gustatory (taste) system.
NUTRITION AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Taste and Diet Quality
Taste preferences strongly influence dietary patterns. People who prefer sweet, salty, or fatty foods tend to consume more processed snacks and sugary beverages. Those more tolerant of bitter compounds may eat more vegetables, especially cruciferous ones like kale and broccoli. Understanding taste tendencies can help predict diet quality and tailor nutrition advice.
Salt, Sugar, and Fat Reduction Strategies
Public health initiatives aim to improve nutrition by reducing excessive salt, sugar, and fat in packaged foods. Strategies include:
Gradual Reformulation: Slowly lowering salt or sugar levels so the palate adapts without noticing sudden changes.
Flavor Enhancement: Using herbs, spices, umami compounds, or natural aromas to maintain palatability while cutting unhealthy ingredients.
Portion Control: Reformulating products into smaller servings to minimize total intake.
These approaches work with our taste system rather than against it, helping populations eat healthier without sacrificing enjoyment.
Taste-Driven Food Addiction and Cravings
Highly processed foods, including those rich in sugar, salt, and fat, activate reward pathways in the brain, triggering dopamine release. Over time, consistent stimulation of these pathways can lead to:
Intense cravings
Loss of control around certain foods
Preference for hyper-palatable snacks over nutrient-dense whole foods
Increased risk of overeating and obesity
Recognizing the biological basis of these cravings helps demystify dietary struggles and encourages more empathetic, effective nutrition strategies.
THE FUTURE OF TASTE SCIENCE
Personalized nutrition and taste genetics
Genetic variations, especially in the TAS2R family of bitter taste receptors, explain why some individuals find certain foods unbearably bitter while others enjoy them (Tepper et al., 2017). Understanding these differences enables personalized nutrition, designing diets aligned with one’s genetic taste profile to improve compliance and health outcomes. Taste genetics may soon guide precision diet planning in clinical nutrition.
Food engineering: balancing flavor and health
Advances in food technology now aim to reconcile sensory pleasure with nutrition. Techniques like microencapsulation, flavor masking, and salt–sugar reduction strategies are used to enhance flavor perception while minimizing unhealthy ingredients. The goal is to design foods that satisfy both the palate and physiological needs, aligning consumer enjoyment with metabolic wellness.
Artificial flavor design and sensory enhancement in the food industryEmerging tools such as AI-driven flavor mapping and virtual sensory simulation are transforming how food developers create taste experiences. By analyzing molecular flavor structures, scientists can engineer new combinations that mimic or enhance natural flavors. These innovations promise more sustainable, health-conscious products without sacrificing sensory appeal.
A Symphony of Senses
Taste is a complex sensory performance, not just a reaction on the tongue. Thousands of receptors and brain circuits work together instantly to shape every flavor we experience. Though this system evolved to help our ancestors avoid toxins and find nourishment, it still guides our cravings and food preferences today. Each bite reflects a delicate interplay between biology, perception, and the pleasures of eating.
Taste is one of the oldest languages our body speaks. It protected our ancestors, shaped our cultures, and still guides every bite we take today. But in today’s world of abundance, this ancient system often works against us, amplifying cravings for sugar, salt, and fat far beyond what our bodies were built for.
Understanding the biology behind taste allows us to step back from instinct and make choices with awareness. When we balance the brain’s drive for pleasure with mindful eating, food becomes not just a source of gratification, but a tool for long-term health.
To understand taste is to understand ourselves, and to use that knowledge to build healthier, more intentional relationships with food.
REFERENCES
Melis, M. & Tomassini Barbarossa, I., 2017. Taste perception of sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami and changes due to l‑arginine supplementation, as a function of genetic ability to taste 6‑n‑propylthiouracil. Nutrients, 9(6), p.541.
Auvray, M. & Spence, C., 2008. The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), pp.1016–1031.
Spence, C., 2020. Multisensory flavour perception: blending, mixing, fusion, and pairing within and between the senses. Foods, 9(4), p.407.
·Tepper, B.J., “Genetic variation in taste perception: does it have a role in healthy eating?” 2010. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 69(1), pp.34–43. (Original: “Genetic variation in taste perception”
· Maehre, H.K., et al., 2024. Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A comprehensive review of physiology, biochemistry, and key sensory compounds. Food & Function. (Advance publication)
Barlow, L.A. (2015) ‘Progress and renewal in gustation: new insights into taste bud development’, Development, 142(19), pp. 3620–3629. doi:10.1242/dev.119479.
Chaudhari, N. and Roper, S.D. (2010) ‘The cell biology of taste’, Journal of Cell Biology, 190(3), pp. 285–296. doi:10.1083/jcb.201003144.
Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M.A., Ryba, N.J.P. and Zuker, C.S. (2006) ‘The receptors and cells for mammalian taste’, Nature, 444(7117), pp. 288–294. doi:10.1038/nature05401.
Roper, S.D. and Chaudhari, N. (2017) ‘Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), pp. 485–497. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.68.
Yarmolinsky, D.A., Zuker, C.S. and Ryba, N.J.P. (2009) ‘Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects’, Cell, 139(2), pp. 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.001.
Nelson, G. et al. (2001) ‘Mammalian sweet taste receptors’, Cell, 106(3), pp. 381–390. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2.
Zhao, G.Q. et al. (2003) ‘The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste’, Cell, 115(3), pp. 255–266. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00844-4.
Reed, D.R. and McDaniel, A.H. (2006) ‘The human sweet taste receptor: a review’, Journal of Food Science, 71(10), pp. R81–R90. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00115.x.
Huang, A.L. et al. (2006) ‘The cells and logic for mammalian sour taste detection’, Nature, 442(7105), pp. 934–938. doi:10.1038/nature05084.
Chandrashekar, J. et al. (2009) ‘The cells and peripheral representation of sodium taste in mice’, Nature, 464(7286), pp. 297–301. doi:10.1038/nature08783.
Bachmanov, A.A. and Beauchamp, G.K. (2007) ‘Taste receptor genes’, Annual Review of Nutrition, 27, pp. 389–414. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.061505.111540.
Roper, S.D. (2015) ‘The taste of salt’, American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology, 308(6), pp. C429–C442. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00417.2014.
Oka, Y., Butnaru, M., von Buchholtz, L., Ryba, N.J.P. and Zuker, C.S. (2013) ‘High salt recruits aversive taste pathways’, Nature, 494(7438), pp. 472–475. doi:10.1038/nature11905.
Meyerhof, W. et al. (2010) ‘The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors’, Chemical Senses, 35(2), pp. 157–170. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp092.
Behrens, M. and Meyerhof, W. (2018) ‘Molecular mechanisms of bitter taste’, Physiological Reviews, 98(1), pp. 231–271. doi:10.1152/physrev.00014.2017.
Reed, D.R. and Knaapila, A. (2010) ‘Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures’, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, 94, pp. 213–240. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-375003-7.00008-2.
Kurihara, K. (2015) ‘Umami the fifth basic taste: history of studies on receptor mechanisms and role as a food flavor’, BioMed Research International, 2015, 189402. doi:10.1155/2015/189402.
Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M.A., Ryba, N.J.P. and Zuker, C.S. (2006) ‘The receptors and cells for mammalian taste’, Nature, 444(7117), pp. 288–294. doi:10.1038/nature05401.
Chaudhari, N. and Roper, S.D. (2010) ‘The cell biology of taste’, Journal of Cell Biology, 190(3), pp. 285–296. doi:10.1083/jcb.201003144.
Tepper, B.J. et al. (2017) ‘Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection’, Annual Review of Nutrition, 37, pp. 341–356. doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064457.
Dotson, C.D., Wallace, M.R. and Bartoshuk, L.M. (2012) ‘The genetic basis of individual differences in taste perception’, Physiology & Behavior, 107(4), pp. 498–503. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.011.
Kinnamon, S.C. (2012) ‘Taste receptor signalling – from tongues to lungs’, Acta Physiologica, 204(2), pp. 158–168. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02308.x.
Roper, S.D. (2014) ‘Taste buds as peripheral chemosensory processors’, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 24(1), pp. 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.11.002.
Comments